The Semantic CSS Debate

LMAX Exchange

Couple of very interesting articles today on architecture of CSS. Firstly Thierry Koblentz questions the benefits of separation of concerns – advocating a coding style where most style rules map a single classname to a single CSS property.

In complete contrast Ben Darlow argues the importance of semantic meaning, pushing back against techniques like OOCSS and BEM which move away from semantic class names in the name of modularity – generally resulting in long strings of class names on elements.

Both are definitely worth reading, but my experience points very strongly towards the benefits of truly semantic class names, especially when used with modern tools like SASS or LESS. It makes it far easier to track what styles are used where and makes the HTML much easier to read and maintain. I now find myself actively advocating against libraries like bootstrap due to the long term maintainability issues their approach to CSS causes.

Adrian Sutton LMAX Exchange Staff Blogs   LMAX Exchange  

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information ("information") contained on this Blog, constitutes marketing communication and it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Further, the information contained within this Blog does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) investment advice or an investment recommendation, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. LMAX Group has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any third parties as comments for every Blog entry.

LMAX Group will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the above information. While the produced information was obtained from sources deemed to be reliable, LMAX Group does not provide any guarantees about the reliability of such sources. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at his or her own risk. It is not a place to slander, use unacceptable language or to promote LMAX Group or any other FX and CFD provider and any such postings, excessive or unjust comments and attacks will not be allowed and will be removed from the site immediately.